Connect with us

Judiciary

Buni denies accusing Supreme Court judges of subverting justice

Published

on

Spread the love

Chairman APC Caretaker Extraordinary Convention Planning Committee, Mai Mala Buni, has denied a claim by opposition  Peoples Democratic Party PDP that he alleged some Supreme court judges of meeting with PDP leadership to subvert the cause of Justice in the case of the Imo North Senatorial election.

The PDP had in a statement issued Tuesday by the party’s publicity secretary, Kola Ologbondiyan, accused the APC chairman of falsely accusing the Justices of the Supreme Court of holding a meeting with PDP leaders allegedly to subvert justice, in a case, in which the PDP is not even a party.

The opposition asked Mala Mai Buni to resign his positions as governor of Yobe State and Interim National Chairman of APC following a pronouncement of the Supreme Court, which found the leadership of the party as “irresponsible and reckless”, for engaging in unsubstantiated allegations against the justices of the Supreme Court.

The PDP statement reads in parts, “Our party, therefore, demands that Alhaji Mai Buni should immediately resign as governor and APC chairperson, having been indicted by the Supreme Court, after which he should face the court to answer for his baseless and “irresponsible” allegation.

“The assertion by the Supreme Court that “if people as highly placed as the interim chairperson of the APC would open his mouth and make this weighty statement against innocent justices of this court…” places a huge moral burden and integrity question on Governor Mai Buni.

Also Read:  Tribunal rejects request to strike out Ize-Iyamu, APC from ADP petition

“Our party holds that the declaration by Supreme Court that the APC has been making such “useless statements” in the past further vindicates our stand that the APC is ethically challenged and should not have been entrusted with governance.”

But in a swift reaction, APC chairman, Mai Mala Buni said, “It has come to my knowledge that an allegation was made against some Supreme court judges claiming that there was a meeting between their Lordships with the PDP to subvert the cause of Justice in the case of the Imo North Senatorial election.

“I want to make my position abundantly clear and in unambiguous terms that, l Hon. Mai Mala Buni, the Executive Governor of Yobe state and Chairman APC Caretaker Extraordinary Convention Planning Committee, had at no time personally said, written nor directed anyone to write on my behalf or the party to allege or claim that their Lordships met with members of the PDP or any political party on any matter.

“I must say l am conscious of the positions their Lordships occupy, and would not be a party or associated with such reckless statements against their Lordships.

“As Leader of APC, l am saddened by such weighty allegation said to be emanating from our party obviously without my consent. On behalf of every member of the party, we distance ourselves from this allegation and sincerely regret the injury and hard feelings this might have caused their Lordships.”

Also Read:  Defamation:El-Rufai sues Odinkalu, Omokri, others for N1.5bn
Continue Reading

Judiciary

The Silence of the Attorney General of the Federation on the Closure of All Court In Nigeria: A Depiction of Love For The Government or Hatred?

Published

on

By

Spread the love
On the 6th day of April 2021, a national strike action was declared by Judicial Staff Union of Nigeria.
The strike is occasioned by the failure the Nigerian government to gant the Judiciary arm of government it’s financial autonomy as earlier agreed. We have heard instances where the Chief Justice of the Federation pleaded with judicial Staff to suspend the JUSUN nation wide strike action, which to me was not even necessary.
I have heard from some notable Nigerians on JUSUN strike stating reasons why the strike should be suspended, but haven’t heard from our own Attorney General the person of Abubakar Malami SAN who is duty bound as the Chief Law Officer to advise the government on the need to end this strike. Should his silence be misconstrued if it is viewed as hatred to the Nigerian government or be construed if viewed as an act of love? Nigerians are all waiting to see his action on this JUSUN nation wide strike.
He should be able to draw a plan for the government to put an end to this issue of Judicial autonomy, it is still not late for him to swing into action for it is within his powers to do so as his powers goes beyond Criminal Prosecution.
Also Read:  Breaking: Edo High Court nullifies the Candidacy of the Governorship and Deputy-Governorship candidates of the APC
Continue Reading

Judiciary

Private Car Owners Do Not Need Roadworthiness Issued By VIO – Appeal Court

Published

on

By

Spread the love

The Court of Appeal sitting at Asaba has just affirmed the judgment of the High Court, Ughelli declaring that the Delta State government lacks the power to authorize and demand the payment of levy and issuance of Road Worthiness Certificate in respect of private vehicles.

Justice Joseph Eyo Ekanem On 12th March 2021, while delivering the judgment in appeal NO: CA/B/333/2017, stated that he found no merit in the Appeal and therefore affirmed the decision of the trial court.

According to the Certified True Copy of the judgment sighted by TheNigeriaLawyer, the Court further stated that “Before drawing the curtain on this judgment, I need to remind public bodies and public officers that a public body or public officer vested with statutory power must take care not to exceed or abuse its or his power.

It or he must keep within the limits of the authority committed to it. This is to prevent arbitrariness and the rule of man rather than the rule of law.

The Vehicle Inspection Officers went beyond the powers vested in them by the Law and the RTR by violently stopping the private vehicle of the Respondent on a public highway using menacing tactics and dangerous implements to demand a certificate of roadworthiness which the said vehicle is not required to have. Such conduct sends a wrong signal to the citizens who may adopt such strong-arm tactics as a means of settling disputes.”

Also Read:  Lawyers gave N9.4bn bribes to judges in three years –ICPC insists

The court also holds that a private motor vehicle is a motor vehicle belonging to a particular person or which is for the use of a particular person or group in carrying their personal effects and not for public use or for hire or reward and it will be absurd and completely illegal to impound a private motor vehicle for not having or carrying hackney license or stage carriage license because it is provided as two of the particulars for which any vehicle may be impounded for not having.

The Appeal Court, therefore, awarded the cost of N200,000 against the Appellants.

The Welfare Secretary of the Nigerian Bar Association and a human rights lawyer, Kunle Edun, had in 2014 brought an action against the Governor of Delta State, the Attorney of the state and the Senior Vehicle Inspector Officer, Ughelli North Local Govt Area, Delta for asking him to produce a valid Road Worthiness Certificate for his private vehicle, when there is no provision of law in the state for such certificate.

Kunle Edun in his Summons noted that the said certificate is required for commercial transporters or haulage.

The trial Court having gone through their pleadings noted that the Road Traffic Law of the state does not confer on them the right to demand and /or collect any fee/ levy or issue certificate of Road Worthiness in respect of vehicles used for private purposes.

Also Read:  Tribunal rejects request to strike out Ize-Iyamu, APC from ADP petition

The court also noted that the money collected by the Defendants to the issuance of the said certificate was illegal and a violation of the provision of the Road Traffic Law (CAP R9) Law of Delta State, 2008.

The trial court, therefore, awarded the cost in the sum of N100,000 against the Defendants in favour of Kunle Edun.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Judiciary Workers Shut Down Supreme Court As Indefinite Strike Begins

Published

on

By

Spread the love

Judiciary workers under the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN) have commenced an indefinite nationwide strike, thereby shutting down the Supreme Court complex in Abuja, in line with their industrial action.

The strike began on Tuesday, based on their demands which include a financial autonomy for the judicial arm of government.

 

The development came as a defiance to the appeal by the Nigerian Bar Association to shelve the strike, saying it was ill-timed, considering the COVID-19 constraints the Nigerian courts had been battling within the last year.

Other Supreme Court workers who are returning from the Easter break were not able to access the complex on Tuesday as the two key judiciary institutions – the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) – which share the same premises with the Supreme Court were also affected.

Staff buses were also seen making a detour upon arriving at the barricaded gate of the Supreme Court.

The court located in the Three Arms Zone in Abuja, a neighbourhood it shares with the Presidential Villa and the National Assembly Complex.

Workers of both the NJC and the FJSC are part of the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), the umbrella body of all judiciary workers at all levels in the nation, and are also bound by the strike declared by the union.

Also Read:  We’re extending our membership beyond North – New NBA

The action taken by the union at the Supreme Court Tuesday morning is expected to be replicated across all Nigerian courts.

JUSUN on April 1 had issued a circular to the effect of its strike, saying it was necessitated by the failure of the federal and state governments to implement a judgment of the Federal High Court, which granted financial autonomy to the judicial arm of government.

The union stated that it had at its last National Executive meeting on March 13, 2021 in Abuja, issued a 21-day ultimatum to the government to implement the financial autonomy of the judiciary with a threat that “failure of which JUSUN will have no other option but to resume the suspended national strike action.”

“Therefore, as a result of the public holiday on April 5, 2021, the strike action has been postponed to Tuesday, April 6, 2021,” the circular partly read.

Continue Reading

Trending